HIVMED Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine 1608-9693 2078-6751 AOSIS HIVMED-20-885 10.4102/sajhivmed.v20i1.885 Case Report A case report of untreatable HIV infection in Harare, Zimbabwe http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3756-3523 Chimbetete Cleophas 1 2 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8799-7103 Chirimuta Linda 2 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3066-3780 Pascoe Margaret 2 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8191-2789 Keiser Olivia 1 Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Newlands Clinic, Harare, Zimbabwe Corresponding author: Cleophas Chimbetete, docchimbetete@gmail.com 27062019 2019 20 1 885 16072018 28022019 © 2019. The Authors 2019 Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Introduction

Zimbabwe, like other resource limited countries, manages HIV infection using the public health approach with standard antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for first, second and third-line treatment. Third-line ART is the last available treatment option and is based on dolutegravir and darunavir use after HIV drug resistance testing.

 Patient Presentation

We report here a 17-year-old patient on dolutegravir (DTG) and Darunavir based third-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) previously exposed to raltegravir who develops multidrug resistance HIV to the four ART classes available in Zimbabwe.

 Management and Outcome

A trophism assay revealed that patient has CXCR4 trophic virus and hence will not benefit from Maraviroc. Patient is currently stable and receiving a holding regimen of abacavir, lamivudine and lamivudine.

 Conclusion

This is the first documented case of multiclass resistance to the four available ART classes in Zimbabwe. The development and transmission of multiclass HIV drug resistance in resource limited settings has potential to undo the gains of national ART programs. There is need to ensure optimum adherence to ART even in the era of DTG.

 Dolutegravir Resistance Untreatable HIV Zimbabwe ART programmes Background

Widespread availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed a positive HIV diagnosis from being a death sentence into a chronic manageable disease. To date, no cure exists for HIV, and hence patients must remain on effective ART for the rest of their lives, that makes the development of drug resistance a major public health concern. Sustained viral suppression is of paramount importance if drug resistance is to be prevented. Strategies to ensure optimal adherence to ART are, therefore, an important component of HIV care and treatment. Antiretroviral therapy resistance limits further treatment options, increases treatment programme costs and drug resistance may even be transmitted to others.1 The rising prevalence of HIV drug resistance poses a great threat to the HIV response and has the potential to drive increase in mortality and HIV incidence.2 Several risk factors for the development of HIV drug resistance among patients on ART have been identified.3

HIV treatment in Zimbabwe is based on a public health approach using standard national treatment guidelines.4 Treatment guidelines have periodically changed and are guided by the World Health Organization (WHO). In 2015, Zimbabwe introduced third-line ART in the national programme. Patients failing second-line ART are referred for specialist assessment that includes viral load (VL) and genotype testing prior to recommending third-line medicines. Adherence needs to be reinforced at all times.4

We report the first case of documented four-class HIV drug resistance in Zimbabwe that highlights the possibility of third-line ART failure and transmission of untreatable HIV in resource-limited settings.

 Case report

We report the case of an adolescent girl born in July 2000. She tested positive for HIV infection in 2009 and was enrolled into care at Newlands Clinic on 30 July 2009. She is the last born in a family of three children, a paternal orphan and stays with her mother. She was vertically infected, and her mother is accessing ART at the same treatment centre. Both her siblings are HIV negative. She commenced first-line ART on 28 August 2009. Table 1 summarises ART regimens received over time and the reasons for regimen changes.

Antiretroviral therapy history by regimen.

ART regimen Start date End date Reason for switch
d4T/3TC/NVP 28/08/2009 30/07/2010 Guideline change
AZT/3TC/NVP 30/07/2010 10/04/2012 Treatment failure
LPV/r/AZT/3TC 10/04/2012 20/01/2015 Guideline change
ATV/r/3TC/ABC 20/01/2015 12/08/2015 Treatment failure
RAL/DRV/r/3TC 12/08/2015 28/07/2016 Clinic decision
DTG/DRV/r/3TC 28/07/2016 21/03/2017 Poor adherence
3TC Monotherapy 21/03/2017 23/01/2018 Change to effective regimen
DTG/DRV/r/3TC 23/01/2018 12/11/2018 Changed to holding regimen
ABC/3TC/AZT 12/11/2018 Current -

ART, antiretroviral therapy; d4T, stavudine; AZT, zidovudine; 3TC, lamivudine; NVP, nevirapine; ABC, abacavir; r, ritonavir; DRV, darunavir; ATV, atazanavir; LPV, lopinavir; RAL, raltegravir.

Monitoring for ART treatment success was done clinically and immunologically since the initiation of treatment. Routine VL monitoring was added in January 2014. Figure 1 highlights the patient’s CD4, VL and ART regimens over time.

CD4 count, viral load and antiretroviral therapy regimens over time.

 HIV drug resistance testing and third-line response

A genotypic resistance test was performed on 31 March 2015 after second-line ART failure. Results of the test were interpreted using the Stanford HIV drug resistance guide. We found four major protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), that is, M46I, I54V, L76V and V82A. The PI RAMs conferred high-level resistance to atazanavir (ATV), lopinavir, indinavir and saquinavir.

There were three nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTI) RAMs, that is, M41L, M184V and T215F, and three non-NRTI RAMs, that is, A98G, K103N and E138A. The RAMs conferred intermediate resistance to abacavir, zidovudine, stavudine, didanosine and rilpivirine. There was high-level resistance to emtricitabine, lamivudine, efavirenz and nevirapine. The virus had low-level resistance to tenofovir and etravirine. Table 2 summarises results of the resistance tests conducted during the course of patient management.

HIV drug resistance test results.

2015
 2016
Medicines Mutations Description of resistance Mutations Description of resistance
NRTI M41L, M184V, T215F M41L, M184V, T215F
Zidovudine Intermediate Intermediate
Lamivudine High level High level
Abacavir Intermediate Intermediate
Emtricitabine High level High level
Tenofovir Low level Susceptible
NNRTI A98G, K103N, E138A A98G, K103N, E138A
Nevirapine High level High level
Efavirenz High level High level
Rilpivirine Intermediate Intermediate
Etravirine Low level Low level
PI M46I, I54V, V82A M46I, I54V, V82A, L76V
Lopinavir High level High level
Atazanavir High level High level
Darunavir Susceptible Intermediate
INSTI† E138K, G140A, Q148R
Elvitegravir High-level resistance
Raltegravir High-level resistance
Darunavir High-level resistance

NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; INSTI, integrase strand transfer inhibitor.

, Test done on 14 June 2018.

She was started on third-line ART in August 2015. She has had challenges with treatment adherence because of the high pill burden, and received 3TC monotherapy as a holding therapy from March 2017 (VL was 255 397 copies/mL) to January 2018. She was treated for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) from 08 August 2017 to 23 January 2018. The TB diagnosis was made based on loss of weight and suggestive chest X-ray findings. She improved clinically on TB treatment, and after completing 6 months of therapy, she recommenced third-line therapy with ritonavir-boosted darunavir, lamivudine and dolutegravir (DTG). She came daily to the clinic for a nurse to observe her and to take third-line medicines for 16 weeks, but her VL remained very high.

An integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) resistance test was then performed on 14 June 2018. Results showed three integrase inhibitor major RAMs, that is, E138K, G140A and Q148R. The RAMs conferred high-level resistance to DTG, raltegravir (RAL) and elvitegravir (ELV). Trophism assay was performed, and results showed that unfortunately the patient is CXCR4 trophic and hence maraviroc is unlikely to work. The recently approved post-attachment inhibitor, ibalizumab, is not available in the country. She was commenced on a holding regimen of ABC, 3TC and AZT, and her latest VL done on 12 November 2018 was 771 334 copies/mL. Her mother is virologically suppressed on a second-line ART regimen of ATV or ritonavir, AZT and 3TC.

 Ethical consideration

Analysis of routine clinical data is approved by the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe as part of a larger study, International Epidemiological Databases to Evaluate AIDs (IeDEA Collaboration) (approval no. MRCZ/A/1336). Verbal assent from adolescent and written informed consent from parent were obtained.

 Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with a virus that has developed multi-class drug resistance to all four standard classes of ART, including INSTIs, in Zimbabwe. This patient has HIV with high-level resistance to DTG after previous exposure to RAL. Recently, a case of multi-drug resistant HIV, including resistance to INSTIs, was reported from Botswana5 and a similar case was reported earlier in South Africa.6 Multi-drug resistant HIV could have developed because of a variety of factors, including poor adherence to ART and inadequate psychosocial support – issues which are frequently encountered among adolescents living with HIV.7 In this case, poor adherence was mainly because of poor family support and lack of motivation for ART when the patient felt clinically well. Poor adherence to previous ART regimens could have led to exposure to DTG monotherapy. Previous studies have shown that monotherapy with DTG has a high rate of resistance selection in the integrase gene through different pathways in case of virologic failure.8

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors are one of the newest class of antiretroviral drugs to be approved for HIV treatment and act by inhibiting the essential HIV protein integrase from inserting the viral DNA genome into the host cell’s chromatin. Raltegravir and EVG have been successful in clinical settings, but have low genetic barriers to resistance. Dolutegravir is known to have a very high genetic barrier to resistance and retains activity against RAL- and EVG-resistant viruses.9,10 Zimbabwe has not yet adopted the use of DTG as part of the preferred first-line ART regimens.

 Conclusion

This is the first case of recorded four-class HIV drug resistance in Zimbabwe. This adolescent girl cannot be effectively treated with any of the currently available ART regimens in Zimbabwe. Prevention measures such as family planning intervention and safe sex counselling are being taken to minimise the risk of transmission of this multi-class resistant virus.

This case emphasises the need for health workers to continue providing adherence counselling and support for patients who are on ART. Transmission of four-class-resistant HIV is a potential public health disaster.

 Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Ruedi Luethy Foundation for providing all the resources required for medical management of this patient, and also acknowledge the nurses and doctors of Newlands Clinic who were involved in the care of this patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

 Authors’ contributions

L.C. and M.P. are the physicians looking after the patient. C.C. and L.C. prepared the first draft of the case report. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 References Tang MW, Shafer RW. HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance: Scientific principles and clinical applications. Drugs. 2012;72(9):1–25. https://doi.org/10.2165/11633630-000000000-00000 Hamers RL, Rinke de Wit TF, Holmes CB. HIV drug resistance in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet HIV. 2018;5(10):e588–e596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30173-5 Wallis CL, Godfrey C, Fitzgibbon JE, Mellors JW. Factors influencing the emergence of human immunodeficiency virus drug resistance in low-and middle-income countries. J Inf Dis. 2017;216(Suppl 9):S851–S856. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jix409 National Medicine and Therapeutics Policy Advisory Committee; The AIDS and TB Directorate Ministry of Health and Child Care. Guidelines for antiretroviral therapy for the prevention and treatment of HIV in Zimbabwe. 2016; p. 1–88. Seatla KK, Avalos A, Moyo S, et al. Four class drug resistant HIV-1 subtype C in a treatment experienced individual on dolutegravir based antiretroviral therapy in Botswana. AIDS. 2018;32(13):1899–1902. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001920 Rossouw TM, Hitchcock S, Botes M. The end of the line? A case of drug resistance to third-line antiretroviral therapy. South Afr J HIV Med. 2016;17(1):3–5. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v17i1.454 Barnett W, Patten G, Kerschberger B, et al. Original article: Perceived adherence barriers among patients failing second-line antiretroviral therapy in Khayelitsha, South Africa. South Afr J HIV Med. 2013;14(4):170–176. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJHIVMED.981 Blanco JL, Marcelin A-G, Katlama C, Martinez E. Dolutegravir resistance mutations. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018;31(3):237–245. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000453 Anstett K, Brenner B, Mesplede T, Wainberg MA. HIV drug resistance against strand transfer integrase inhibitors. Retrovirology. 2017;14(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12977-017-0360-7 Dow DE, Bartlett JA. Dolutegravir, the second-generation of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) for the treatment of HIV. Infect Dis Ther. 2014;3(2):83–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-014-0029-7

How to cite this article: Chimbetete C, Chirimuta L, Pascoe M, Keiser O. A case report of untreatable HIV infection in Harare, Zimbabwe. S Afr J HIV Med. 2019;20(1), a885. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v20i1.885