Original Research

Outcomes of a model for re-testing HIV-negative index contacts in Sedibeng, South Africa

Ditebogo L. Phiri, Kate Rees, Natasha Davis
Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine | Vol 24, No 1 | a1482 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v24i1.1482 | © 2023 Ditebogo L. Phiri, Kate Rees, Natasha Davies | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 06 February 2023 | Published: 29 May 2023

About the author(s)

Ditebogo L. Phiri, HIV Testing Services, Faculty of Public Health, Johannesburg, South Africa; and, Anova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa
Kate Rees, HIV Testing Services, Faculty of Public Health, Johannesburg, South Africa; and, Anova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa
Natasha Davis, Department of Clinical Care, Faculty of Public Health, Anova Health Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Index contact testing is an HIV case-finding approach that elicits sexual or needle-sharing partners, as well as biological children, of people living with HIV (PLHIV) and offers them HIV testing services.

Objectives: We aim to describe the results of an innovative project in Sedibeng District that expanded index testing by retesting previously negative contacts and incorporating status-neutral testing.

Method: We used registers to identify people who previously tested HIV-negative through index testing from March 2019 to September 2021. The individuals were telephonically traced and offered HIV retesting. Data were collected on a weekly basis using REDCap®. We monitored the number of individuals called, those who came back for retest, and their HIV results.

Results: Fifteen counsellors contacted 968 people over 12 months. Forty-eight percent (462 out of 968) of those called returned for testing. Of those, 121 (26%) tested positive. Overall, 66 out of 276 (24%) men with HIV and 55 out of 186 (30%) women with HIV were identified and linked to antiretroviral treatment (ART). Fifty-seven percent (194 out of 341) of clients who tested HIV-negative were offered, and 124 out of 194 (64%) initiated, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). All individuals who retested HIV-positive had a new diagnosis; none reported having had another positive test result between the original negative and the positive retest.

Conclusion: Revisiting index clients with a previous negative HIV test result is worthwhile, creating an opportunity to identify undiagnosed PLHIV and high-risk people for PrEP. The high positivity rate highlights the importance of providing a sero-neutral approach to HIV testing, including integrating prevention messaging and linkage to PrEP services.


Keywords

index contacts testing; routine data; HIV case-finding; seroconversion; sero-different couples; pre-exposure prophylaxis; REDCAP; U=U

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3706
Total article views: 5128

 

Crossref Citations

1. Barriers and facilitators to HIV index contact testing in facility and community settings
Nyeleti Pretty Chauke, Cathrine Chinyandura, Fezile Buthelezi, Anele Jiyani, Kate Rees
Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine  vol: 26  issue: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.4102/SAJHIVMED.v26i1.1733

2. Experiences of Testing Negative or Positive for HIV in Malawi, South Africa, and Zambia: A Cross-Sectional Study
N. Mutanda, A. Morgan, A. Huber, N. Scott, I. Mokhele, T. Tcherini, T. Masina, R. Nyirenda, A. Kamanga, P. Lumano-Mulenga, S. Rosen, S. Pascoe
AIDS and Behavior  vol: 30  issue: 3  first page: 766  year: 2026  
doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04921-6

3. Integrating status-neutral and targeted HIV testing in Zimbabwe: A complementary strategy
Hamufare D. Mugauri, Owen Mugurungi, Joconiah Chirenda, Kudakwashe Takarinda, Prosper Mangwiro, Mufuta Tshimanga, Zypher Jude G. Regencia
PLOS ONE  vol: 20  issue: 2  first page: e0302803  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302803